The 18 linked references in paper V. Kalita V., A. Gaidai S., В. Калита В., А. Гайдай С. (2018) “РЕЛЕВАНТНОСТЬ ПСИХОЛОГИЧЕСКОГО ПОРТРЕТА КАК ДЕТЕРМИНАНТА ЭФФЕКТА БАРНУМА // RELEVANCE OF INTERPRETATION AS THE DETERMINANT OF THE BARNUM EFFECT” / spz:neicon:vestnik-k:y:2018:i:1:p:133-138

  1. Forer B. R. The fallacy of personal validation: a classroom demonstration of gullibility // The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology. 1949. No 44. P. 118–123. DOI: 10.1037/h0059240.
  2. Rosen G. M. Effects of source prestige on subjects’ acceptance of the Barnum effect: Psychologist versus astrologer // Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. 1975. No 43. P. 95. DOI: 10.1037/h0076289.
  3. Mosher D. L. Approval Motive and Acceptance of "Fake" Personality Test Interpretations which Differ in Favorability // Psychological Reports. 1965. No 17(2). P. 395–402. DOI: 10.2466/pr0.1965.17.2.395.
  4. Richards W. S., Merrens M. R. Student evaluation of generalized personality interpretations as a function of method of assessment // Journal of Clinical Psychology. 1971. No 27. P. 457–459. DOI: 10.1002/1097-4679(197110)27:4<457:: aid-jclp2270270413>;2-i.
  5. Калита В. В., Гайдай А. С. Детерминанты эффекта Барнума: объективность характера тривиальных личностных описаний // Сибирский психологический журнал. 2014. No 54. С. 48–61.
  6. Mason O. J., Budge K. Schizotypy, self-referential thinking and the Barnum effect // Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry. 2011. No 42. P. 145–148. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbtep.2010.11.003.
  7. Rogers P., Soule J. Cross-Cultural Differences in the Acceptance of Barnum Profiles Supposedly Derived From Western Versus Chinese Astrology // Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology. 2009. No 40. P. 381–399. DOI: 10.1177/0022022109332843.
  8. Layne C. Gender and the Barnum Effect: A Reinterpretation of Piper-Terry and Downey’s Results // Psychological Reports. 1998. No 83. P. 608–610. DOI: 10.2466/pr0.1998.83.2.608.
  9. Калита В. В., Гайдай А. С. Профессиональная направленность и тип описания как детерминанты эффекта Барнума // Вестник Кемеровского государственного университета. 2013. No 4-1. С. 113–117.
  10. Rosen G. M. Barnum Effect. The Encyclopedia of Clinical Psychology, 2015. 1–3. DOI: 10.1002/9781118625392. wbecp482.
  11. Snyder C. R., Larson G. R. A further look at student acceptance of general personality interpretations // Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. 1972. No 38. P. 384–388. DOI: 10.1037/h0032899.
  12. Snyder C. R. Acceptance of personality interpretations as a function of assessment procedures // Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. 1974. No 42. P. 150. DOI: 10.1037/h0036033.
  13. Snyder C. R., Larsen D. L., Bloom L. J. Acceptance of general personality interpretations prior to and after receipt of diagnostic feedback supposedly based on psychological, graphological, and astrological assessment procedures // Journal of Clinical Psychology. 1976. No 32. P. 258–265. DOI: 10.1002/1097-4679(197604)32:2<258:: aid-jclp2270320211>;2-o.
  14. Dickson D. H., Kelly I. W. The ‘Barnum Effect’ in Personality Assessment: A Review of the Literature // Psychological Reports. 1985. No 57. P. 367–382. DOI: 10.2466/pr0.1985.57.2.367.
  15. Snyder C. R., Shenkel R. J. Effects of «favorability,» modality, and relevance on acceptance of general personality interpretations prior to and after receiving diagnostic feedback // Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. 1976. No 44. P. 34–41. DOI: 10.1037//0022-006x.44.1.34.
  16. Jackson D. E. The effect of test taking on acceptance of bogus personality statements // Journal of Clinical Psychology. 1978. No 34. P. 63–68. DOI: 10.1002/1097-4679(197801)34:1<63::aid-jclp2270340113>;2-x.
  17. Baillargeon J., Danis C. Barnum Meets the Computer: A Critical Test // Journal of Personality Assessment. 1984. No 48. P. 415–419. DOI: 10.1207/s15327752jpa4804_15.
  18. Collins R. W., Dmitruk V. M., Ranney J. T. Personal validation: Some empirical and ethical considerations // Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. 1977. No 45. P. 70–77. DOI: 10.1037//0022-006x.45.1.70.