The 46 references in paper M. Makarova N., V. Makarov G., E. Shekunova V., М. Макарова Н., В. Макаров Г., Е. Шекунова В. (2018) “Методические подходы к оценке нейротоксичности фармакологических веществ // Methodological approaches to the assessment of pharmaceutical substances neurotoxicity” / spz:neicon:vedomostincesmp:y:2017:i:2:p:111-116

1
Safety Pharmacology Studies for Human Pharmaceuticals (ICH Topic S7A), 2000. Available from: https:// goo.gl/H0MQFy.
(check this in PDF content)
2
Guidance on evaluation of medicines. Vol. I. Moscow: Grif i K; 2013 (in Russian).
(check this in PDF content)
3
State Standard R 56700–2015. Medicinal products for human use. Preclinical safety pharmacology studies. Moscow: Standartinform; 2016 (in Russian).
(check this in PDF content)
4
Engalycheva GN, Syubaev RD, Vasiliev AN, Snegireva AA, Verstakova OL. Drug pharmacological safety evaluation in preclinical studies. The Bulletin of the Scientific Centre for Expert Evaluation of Medicinal Products 2013; (1): 10–3 (in Russian).
(check this in PDF content)
5
Irwin S. Comprehensive observational assessment: Ia. A systematic, quantitative procedure for assessing the behavioral and physiologic state of the mouse. Psychopharmacologia 1968; 13(3): 222–57.
(check this in PDF content)
6
Irwin S. Drug screening and evaluation of new compounds in animals. In: Nodin JH, Siegler PE, eds. Animal and clinical techniques in drug evaluation. Chicago: Year Book Medical Publishers; 1964. P. 36–54.
(check this in PDF content)
7
Zilber YuD. The effect of tricresyl phosphate on myelin sheaths and its membrane toxicity (Some aspects of poisoning pathogenesis). Dr. Med. Sci [thesis]. Moscow; 1971 (in Russian).
(check this in PDF content)
8
Mullins RJ, Xu S, Pereira EF, Pescrille JD, Todd SW, Mamczarz J, et al. Prenatal exposure of guinea pigs to the organophosphorus pesticide chlorpyrifos disrupts the structural and functional integrity of the brain. Neurotoxicology 2015; 48: 9–20.
(check this in PDF content)
9
Dobbing J, Sands J. Growth and development of the brain and spinal cord of the guinea pig. Brain Res. 1970; 17(1): 115–23.
(check this in PDF content)
10
Inns RH, Leadbeater L. The efficacy of bispyridinium derivatives in the treatment of organophosphonate poisoning in the guinea-pig. J Pharm Pharmacol. 1983; 35(7): 427–33.
(check this in PDF content)
11
Fonnum F, Sterri SH, Aas P, Johnsen H. Carboxylesterases, importance for detoxification of organophosphorus anticholinesterases and trichothecenes. Fundam Appl Toxicol. 1985; 5(6 Pt 2): S29–38.
(check this in PDF content)
12
Avdeeva OI, Makarova MN, Makarov VG. Aspects of studying general toxic properties of antipsychotic agents. Pharmacy 2017; (4) (in Russian). In press.
(check this in PDF content)
13
Moran-Gates T, Massari C, Graulich A, Liegeois JF, Tarazi FI. Long-term effects of JL 13, a potential atypical antipsychotic, on rat dopamine and serotonin receptor subtypes. Journal of Neuroscience Research 2006; 84(3): 675–82.
(check this in PDF content)
14
Staay FJ, Pouzet B, Mahieu M, Nordquist RE, Schuurman T. The d-amphetamine-treated Göttingen miniature pig: an animal model for assessing behavioral effects of antipsychotics. Psychopharmacology 2009; 206(4): 715–29.
(check this in PDF content)
15
Minuzzi L, Olsen AK, Bender D, Arnfred S, Grant R, Danielsen EH, Cumming P. Quantitative autoradiography of ligands for dopamine receptors and transporters in brain of Göttingen minipig: comparison with results in vivo. Synapse 2006; 59(4): 211–19.
(check this in PDF content)
16
Elman I, Borsook D, Lukas SE. Food intake and reward mechanisms in patients with schizophrenia: implications for metabolic disturbances and treatment with second-generation antipsychotic agents. Neuropsychopharmacology 2006; 31(10): 2091–120.
(check this in PDF content)
17
Haddad PM, Wieck A. Antipsychotic-induced hyperprolactinaemia: mechanisms, clinical features and management. Drugs 2004; 64(20): 2291–314.
(check this in PDF content)
18
State Standard R 56701–2015. Medicinal products for human use. Guideline on planning preclinical safety studies for the purpose of subsequently conducting clinical trials and carrying out authorisation of medicines. Moscow: Standartinform; 2016 (in Russian).
(check this in PDF content)
19
OECD Guidelines for the Testing of Chemicals, Section 4. Test ¹ 418: Delayed Neurotoxicity of Organophosphorus Substances Following Acute Exposure.
(check this in PDF content)
20
OECD Guidelines for the Testing of Chemicals, Section 4. Test ¹ 424: Neurotoxicity Study in Rodents.
(check this in PDF content)
21
Tupper DE, Wallace RB. Utility of the Neurologic Examination in Rats. Acta Neurobiol Exp. 1980; 40(6): 999–1003.
(check this in PDF content)
22
Gad SC. A Neuromuscular Screen for Use in Industrial Toxicology. J Toxicol Environ Health 1982; 9(5–6): 691–704.
(check this in PDF content)
23
Moser VC, McDaniel KM, Phillips PM. Rat Strain and Stock Comparisons Using a Functional Observational Battery: Baseline Values and Effects of Amitraz. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 1991; 108(2): 267–83.
(check this in PDF content)
24
Meyer OA, Tilson HA, Byrd WC, Riley MT. A method for the routine assessment of fore- and hindlimb grip strength of rats and mice. Neurobehav Toxicol. 1979; 1(3): 233–6.
(check this in PDF content)
25
Crofton KM, Howard JL, Moser VC, Gill MW, Reiter LW, Tilson HA, MacPhail RC. Interlaboratory Comparison of Motor Activity Experiments: Implication for Neurotoxicological Assessments. Neurotoxicol Teratol. 1991; 13(6): 599–609.
(check this in PDF content)
26
Environmental Health Criteria Document 60: Principles and Methods for the Assessment of Neurotoxicity Associated with Exposure to Chemicals. World Health Organization, 1986.
(check this in PDF content)
27
Spencer PS, Schaumburg HH. Experimental and Clinical Neurotoxicology. Baltimore/London: Williams and Wilkins; 1980.
(check this in PDF content)
28
Bancroft JD, Steven A. Chapter 17. Theory and Practice of Histological Techniques. In: Neuropathological Techniques. Churchill Livingstone: Lowe, James and Cox; 1990.
(check this in PDF content)
29
Abou-Donia MB, Graham DG. Delayed neurotoxicity of subchronic oral administration of leptophos to hens: recovery during four months after exposure. J Toxicol Environ Health. 1979; 5(6): 1133–47.
(check this in PDF content)
30
Konno N, Katoh K, Yamauchi T, Fukushima M. The effects of drug metabolism inducers on the delayed neurotoxicity and disposition of tri-o-cresyl phosphate in hens following a single intravenous administration. J Toxicol Sci. 1988; 13(1): 17–30.
(check this in PDF content)
31
Yamauchi T, Katoh K, Konno N, Fukushima M. Delayed neurotoxicity and toxicokinetics of leptophos in hens given repeatedly by low-dose intravenous injections. J Toxicol Sci. 1989; 14(1): 11–21.
(check this in PDF content)
32
Kapoor A, Matthews SG. Prenatal stress modifies behavior and hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal function in female guinea pig offspring: effects of timing of prenatal stress and stage of reproductive cycle. Endocrinology 2008; 149(12): 6406–15.
(check this in PDF content)
33
Dringenberg HC, Richardson DP, Brien JF, Reynolds JN. Spatial learning in the guinea pig: cued versus non-cued learning, sex differences, and comparison with rats. Behav Brain Res. 2001; 124(1): 97–101.
(check this in PDF content)
34
Lewejohann L, Pickel T, Sachser N, Kaiser S. Wild genius — domestic fool? Spatial learning abilities of wild and domestic guinea pigs. Front Zool. 2010; (7): 9.
(check this in PDF content)
35
Mattsson JL, Spencer PJ, Albee RR. A performance standard for clinical and functional observation battery examination of rats. J Am Coll Toxicol. 1996; 15(3): 239–54.
(check this in PDF content)
36
Current protocols in toxicology. Vol. 2. New York: Wiley and Sons; 2005.
(check this in PDF content)
37
Netto CA, Izquierdo I. On how passive is inhibitory avoidance. Behav Neural Biol. 1985; 43(3): 327–30.
(check this in PDF content)
38
Boissier JR, Simon P, Aron C. A new method for rapid screening of minor tranquilizers in mice. Europ J Pharmacol. 1968; 4(2): 45–51.
(check this in PDF content)
39
Jarvik ME, Kopp R. An improvedone-trial learning situation in mice. Psychol Rep. 1967; 21(1): 221–4.
(check this in PDF content)
40
King RA, Glasser RL. Duration of electroconvulsive shock-induced retrograde amnesia in rats. Physiol Behav. 1970; 5(3): 335–9.
(check this in PDF content)
41
Morris R. Developments of a water-maze procedure for studying spatial learning in the rat. J Neurosci. 1984; 11(1): 47–60.
(check this in PDF content)
42
Morris R, Anderson E, Lynch G, Baudry M. Selective impairment of learning and blockade of long-term potentiation by an N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor antagonist. Nature 1986; 319(6056): 774–6.
(check this in PDF content)
43
Lankin VS, Nikitin SV, Trapezov OV. Factors contributing to the variation of the fearful withdrawal response to humans in minipigs bred at ICG SB RAS. Vavilov Journal of Genetics and Breeding 2015; 19(5): 613–23 (in Russian).
(check this in PDF content)
44
Lind NM, Arnfred SM, Hemmingsen RP, Hansen AK, Jensen KH. Open field behaviour and reaction to novelty in Göttingen miniature pigs: effects of d-amphetamine and Haloperidol. Scan J Lab Animal Sci. 2005; 32: 103–12.
(check this in PDF content)
45
Moustgaard A, Lind NM, Hemmingsen R, Hansen AK. Spontaneous Object Recognition in the Göttingen Minipig. Neural Plast. 2002; 9(4): 255–9.
(check this in PDF content)
46
Haagensen AM, Klein AB, Ettrup A, Matthews LR, Sorensen DB. Cognitive Performance of Göttingen Minipigs Is Affected by Diet in a Spatial Hole-Board Discrimination Test. PLoS One 2013; 8(11): e79429. AUTHORS
(check this in PDF content)