The 15 references in paper A. Antonov V., E. Zharko F., V. Promyslov G., А. Антонов В., Е. Жарко Ф., В. Промыслов Г. (2016) “ПРОБЛЕМЫ ОЦЕНКИ НАДЕЖНОСТИ И КАЧЕСТВА ПРОГРАММНОГО ОБЕСПЕЧЕНИЯ В АВТОМАТИЗИРОВАННЫХ СИСТЕМАХ УПРАВЛЕНИЯ ТЕХНОЛОГИЧЕСКИМИ ПРОЦЕССАМИ // PROBLEMS OF EVALUATION OF SOFTWARE DEPENDABILITY AND QUALITY IN INDUSTRIAL AUTOMATION AND CONTROL SYSTEMS” / spz:neicon:sustain:y:2015:i:4:p:87-96

1
Бывайков М.Е., Жарко Е.Ф., Менгазетдинов Н.Э., Полетыкин А.Г., Прангишвили И.В., Промыслов В.Г. Опыт проектирования и внедрения системы верхнего блочного уровня АСУ ТП АЭС // Автоматика и телемеханика. 2006. No 5. С. 65-79.
(check this in PDF content)
2
Smith D., DeLong T., Johnson B.W. A Safety Assessment Methodology for Complex Safety-Critical Hardware/Software Systems // International Topical Meeting on Nuclear Plant Instrumentation, Controls, and Human-Machine Interface Technologies. Washington, DC, November, 2000
(check this in PDF content)
3
Липаев В.В. Надежность программных средств. М.: СИНТЕГ, 1998.
(check this in PDF content)
4
Aldernir T., Miller D.W., Stovsky M.P., Kirschenbaurr J., Bucci P., Fentiman A.W., Mangan L.T. Current State of Reliability Modeling Methodologies for Digital Systems and Their Acceptance Criteria for Nuclear Power Plant Assessments (NUREG/CR-6901).
(check this in PDF content)
5
Halstead M.H. Elements of Software Science. New York: Elsevier, 1977.
(check this in PDF content)
6
Devooght J., Smidts C. Probabilistic Reactor Dynamics l: The theory of continuous event trees // Nuclear Science and Engineering. 1992. Vol. 111. No. 3. P. 229-240.
(check this in PDF content)
7
Acosta C., Siu N. Dynamic event trees in accident sequence analysis: Application to steam generator tube rupture // Reliab. Engng & System Safety. 1993. Vol. 41, No. 2. P. 135-154.
(check this in PDF content)
8
Goddard P.L. A Combined Analysis Approach to Assessing Requirements for Safety Critical RealTime Control Systems // Reliability and Maintainability Symposium, 1996 Proceedings. International Symposium on Product Quality and Integrity., Annual. P. 110-115.
(check this in PDF content)
9
Stamataletos M. et.al. Probabilistic Risk Assessment Procedures Guide for NASA Managers and Practitioners, Version 1.1, August, 2002.
(check this in PDF content)
10
Andrews J.D., Dugan J.B. Dependency modeling using fault-tree analysis // Proceedings of the 17 International System Safety Conference, The System Safety Society, Unionville, Virginia, 1999. P. 67-76.
(check this in PDF content)
11
Matsuoka T., Kobayashi M. An analysis of a dynamic system by the GOFLOW methodology // Proc. ESREL’96/PSAM III, Crete, 1996. P. 1547-1552.
(check this in PDF content)
12
Smidts C., Li M. Validation of a Methodology for Assessing Software Quality. Report UMDRE 2002-07. February, 2002.
(check this in PDF content)
13
NEA/CSNI Recommendations on assessing digital system reliability in probabilistic risk assessment of nuclear power plants. 2009. 157 p.
(check this in PDF content)
14
Fitzpatrick R. Software Quality: Definitions and Strategic Issues. Staffordshire University, School of Computing Report. 1996. 35 p.
(check this in PDF content)
15
Жарко Е.Ф. Сравнение моделей качества программного обеспечения: аналитический подход // XII Всероссийское совещание по проблемам управления. ВСПУ-2014. Москва, 16-19 июня 2014 г.: Труды. М.: ИПУ РАН, 2014. С. 4585-4594.
(check this in PDF content)