The 71 references in paper , статья Редакционная (2014) “Алгоритм диагностики тромбоэмболии легочной артерии у беременных: клинические рекомендации Американского торакального общества / Общества торакальной радиологии // Diagnostic algorithm for pulmonary embolism in pregnant women (based on practice guidelines of the American Thoracic Society and the Society of Thoracic Radiology)” / spz:neicon:pulmonology:y:2012:i:2:p:13-24

1
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Pregnancyrelated mortality surveillance–United States, 1991–1999. Morbid. Mortal. Wkly Rep. 2003; 52: 1–8.
(check this in PDF content)
2
Marik P.E., Plante L.A. Venous thromboembolic disease and pregnancy. N. Engl. J. Med. 2008; 359: 2025–2033.
(check this in PDF content)
3
Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Greentop Guideline No 28: Thromboembolic disease in pregnancy and the puerperium: Acute management. 2007 [accessed Oct. 4, 2011]. Available from: www.rcog.org.uk / guidelines
(check this in PDF content)
4
Stein P.D., Woodard P.K., Weg J.G. et al.Diagnostic pathways in acute pulmonary embolism: recommendations of the PIOPED II Investigators. Radiology 2007; 242: 15–21.
(check this in PDF content)
5
Schuster M.E., Fishman J.E., Copeland J.F. et al.Pulmonary embolism in pregnant patients: a survey of practices and policies for CT pulmonary angiography. Am. J. Roentgenol. 2003; 181: 1495–1498.
(check this in PDF content)
6
Bourjeily G., Paidas M., Khalil H. et al. Pulmonary embolism in pregnancy. Lancet 2010; 375: 500–512.
(check this in PDF content)
7
Schunemann H.J., Jaeschke R., Cook D.J. et al. An official ATS statement: grading the quality of evidence and strength of recommendations in ATS guidelines and recommendations. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2006; 174: 605–614.
(check this in PDF content)
8
Chan W.S., Ray J.G., Murray S. et al.Suspected pulmonary embolism in pregnancy: clinical presentation, results of lung scanning, and subsequent maternal and pediatric outcomes. Arch. Intern. Med. 2002; 162: 1170–1175.
(check this in PDF content)
9
Cahill A.G., Stout M.J., Macones G.A., Bhalla S. Diagnosing pulmonary embolism in pregnancy using computed-tomographic angiography or ventilation-perfusion. Obstetr. and Gynecol. 2009; 114: 124–129.
(check this in PDF content)
10
Gherman R.B., Goodwin T.M., Leung B. et al. Incidence, clinical characteristics, and timing of objectively diagnosed venous thromboembolism during pregnancy. Obstetr. and Gynecol. 1999; 94: 730–734.
(check this in PDF content)
11
Powrie R.O., Larson L., Rosene*Montella K. et al. Alveolararterial oxygen gradient in acute pulmonary embolism in pregnancy. Am. J. Obstetr. Gynecol. 1998; 178: 394–396.
(check this in PDF content)
12
Heit J.A., Kobbervig C.E., James A.H. et al. Trends in the incidence of venous thromboembolism during pregnancy or postpartum: a 30-year population-based study. Ann. Intern. Med. 2005; 143: 697–706.
(check this in PDF content)
13
Damodaram M., Kaladindi M., Luckit J., Yoong W.D-dimers as a screening test for venous thromboembolism in pregnancy: is it of any use? J. Obstetr. Gynaecol.2009; 29: 101–103.
(check this in PDF content)
14
Levy M.S., Spencer F., Ginsberg J.S., Anderson J.A. Reading between the (Guidelines). Management of submassive pulmonary embolism in the first trimester of pregnancy. Thromb. Res. 2008; 121: 705–707.
(check this in PDF content)
15
To M.S., Hunt B.J., Nelson*Piercy C. A negative D-dimer does not exclude venous thromboembolism (VTE) in pregnancy. J. Obstetr. Gynaecol. 2008; 28: 222–223.
(check this in PDF content)
16
Chan W.S., Lee A., Spencer F.A. et al. D-dimer testing in pregnant patients: towards determining the next ’level’ in the diagnosis of deep vein thrombosis. J. Thromb. Haemost. 2010; 8: 1004–1011.
(check this in PDF content)
17
Kovac M., Mikovic Z., Rakicevic L. et al. The use of D-dimer with new cutoff can be useful in diagnosis of venous thromboembolism in pregnancy. Eur. J. Obstetr. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 2010; 148: 27–30.
(check this in PDF content)
18
Chan W.S., Chunilal S., Lee A. et al.A red blood cell agglutination D-dimer test to exclude deep venous thrombosis in pregnancy. Ann. Intern. Med. 2007; 147: 165–170.
(check this in PDF content)
19
Ahmad A., Jamjute P., Ghosh T., Klazinga D.D-dimer negative deep vein thrombosis in puerperium. Eur. Clin. Obstetr. Gynaecol. 2008; 3: 131–134.
(check this in PDF content)
20
International Commission of Radiological Protection. Pregnancy and medical radiation: Publication 84. Ann. ICRP 2000; 30: 1–44. 23
(check this in PDF content)
21
McCollough C.H., Schueler B.A., Atwell T.D. et al. Radiation exposure and pregnancy: when should we be concerned? Radiographics 2007; 27: 909–917; discuss. 917–908.
(check this in PDF content)
22
Linet M.S., Kim K.P., Rajaraman P.Children’s exposure to diagnostic Medical radiation and cancer risk: epidemiologic and dosimetric considerations. Pediatr. Radiol. 2009; 39: S4–S26.
(check this in PDF content)
23
Committee to Assess Health Risks from Exposure to Low Levels of Ionizing Radiation NRC. Health risks from exposure to low levels of ionizing radiation: BEIR VII – Phase 2. Washington: National Academy Press; 2006.
(check this in PDF content)
24
Bourjeily G., Chalhoub M., Phornphutkul C. et al. Neonatal thyroid function: effect of a single exposure to iodinated contrast medium in utero. Radiology 2010; 256: 744–750.
(check this in PDF content)
25
Food and Drug Administration. Content and format of labeling for human prescription drug and biological products; requirements for pregnancy and lactation labeling. Fed. Registr. 2008; 29: 30831–30868.
(check this in PDF content)
26
Lin S.P., Brown J.J. MR contrast agents: physical and pharmacologic basics. J. Magn. Reson. Imag. 2007; 25: 884–899.
(check this in PDF content)
27
Webb J.A., Thomsen H.S., Morcos S.K. The use of iodinated and gadolinium contrast Med.ia during pregnancy and lactation. Eur. Radiol. 2005; 15: 1234–1240.
(check this in PDF content)
28
Worsley D.F., Alavi A., Aronchick J.M. et al. Chest radiographic findings in patients with acute pulmonary embolism: observations from the PIOPED Study. Radiology 1993; 189: 133–136.
(check this in PDF content)
29
Greenspan R.H., Ravin C.E., Polansky S.M., McLoud T.C. Accuracy of the chest radiograph in diagnosis of pulmonary embolism. Invest. Radiol. 1982; 17: 539–543.
(check this in PDF content)
30
Gottschalk A., Stein P.D., Goodman L.R., Sostman H.D. Overview of prospective investigation of pulmonary embolism diagnosis II. Semin. Nucl. Med. 2002; 32: 173–182.
(check this in PDF content)
31
Daftary A., Gregory M., Seibyl J.P., Saluja S.Chest radiograph as a triage tool in the imaging-based diagnosis of pulmonary embolism. Am. J. Roentgenol. 2005; 185: 132–134.
(check this in PDF content)
32
Forbes K.P., Reid J.H., Murchison J.T. Do preliminary chest X-ray findings define the optimum role of pulmonary scintigraphy in suspected pulmonary embolism? Clin. Radiol. 2001; 56: 397–400.
(check this in PDF content)
33
Scarsbrook A.F., Bradley K.M., Gleeson F.V.Perfusion scintigraphy: diagnostic utility in pregnant women with suspected pulmonary embolic disease. Eur. Radiol. 2007; 17: 2554–2560.
(check this in PDF content)
34
Ridge C.A., McDermott S., Freyne B.J. et al.Pulmonary embolism in pregnancy: comparison of pulmonary CT angiography and lung scintigraphy. Am. J. Roentgenol. 2009; 193: 1223–1227.
(check this in PDF content)
35
Righini M., Le Gal G., Aujesky D. et al.Diagnosis of pulmonary embolism by multidetector CT alone or combined with venous ultrasonography of the leg: a randomised noninferiority trial. Lancet 2008; 371: 1343–1352.
(check this in PDF content)
36
Rossum A.B., van Houwelingen H.C., Kieft G.J., Patty* nama P.M. Prevalence of deep vein thrombosis in suspected and proven pulmonary embolism: a meta-analysis. Br. J. Radiol. 1998; 71: 1260–1265.
(check this in PDF content)
37
Chan W.S., Lee A., Spencer F.A. et al. Predicting deep venous thrombosis in pregnancy: out in “LEFt” field? Ann. Intern. Med. 2009; 151: 85–92.
(check this in PDF content)
38
Parker J.A., Coleman R.E., Siegel B.A. et al.Procedure guideline for lung scintigraphy: 1.0. Society of Nuclear Medicine. J. Nucl. Med. 1996; 37: 1906–1910.
(check this in PDF content)
39
Shahir K., Goodman L.R., Tali A. et al.Pulmonary embolism in pregnancy: CT pulmonary angiography versus perfusion scanning. Am. J. Roentgenol. 2010; 195: W214– W220.
(check this in PDF content)
40
Revel M.P., Cohen S., Sanchez O. et al.Pulmonary embolism during pregnancy: diagnosis with lung scintigraphy or CT angiography? Radiology 2011; 258: 590–598.
(check this in PDF content)
41
King U., Im J.M., Freeman S.J. et al.Quality of CT pulmonary angiography for suspected pulmonary embolus in pregnancy. Eur. Radiol. 2008; 18: 2709–2715.
(check this in PDF content)
42
Litmanovich D., Boiselle P.M., Bankier A.A. et al.Dose reduction in computed tomographic angiography of pregnant patients with suspected acute pulmonary embolism. J. Comput. Assist. Tomogr. 2009; 33: 961–966.
(check this in PDF content)
43
Kluge A., Luboldt W., Bachmann G. Acute pulmonary embolism to the subsegmental level: diagnostic accuracy of three MRI techniques compared with 16-MDCT. AJR Am. J. Roentgenol. 2006; 187: W7–14.
(check this in PDF content)
44
Chen M.M., Coakley F.V., Kaimal A., Laros R.K.Jr. Guidelines for computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging use during pregnancy and lactation. Obstetr. and Gynecol. 2008; 112: 333–340.
(check this in PDF content)
45
Meaney J.F., Weg J.G., Chenevert T.L. et al. Diagnosis of pulmonary embolism with magnetic resonance angiography. N. Engl. J. Med. 1997; 336: 1422–1427.
(check this in PDF content)
46
Gupta A., Frazer C.K., Ferguson J.M. et al.Acute pulmonary embolism: diagnosis with MR angiography. Radiology 1999; 210: 353–359.
(check this in PDF content)
47
Oudkerk M., van Beek E.J., Wielopolski P. et al. Comparison of contrastenhanced magnetic resonance angiography and conventional pulmonary angiography for the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism: a prospective study. Lancet 2002; 359: 1643–1647.
(check this in PDF content)
48
Ohno Y., Higashino T., Takenaka D. et al.MR angiography with sensitivity encoding (SENSE) for suspected pulmonary embolism: comparison with MDCT and ventilation-perfusion scintigraphy. Am. J. Roentgenol. 2004; 183: 91–98.
(check this in PDF content)
49
Pleszewski B., Chartrand*Lefebvre C., Qanadli S.D. et al. Gadolinium-enhanced pulmonary magnetic resonance angiography in the diagnosis of acute pulmonary embolism: a prospective study on 48 patients. Clin. Imag. 2006; 30: 166–172.
(check this in PDF content)
50
Stein P.D., Chenevert T.L., Fowler S.E. et al. Gadoliniumenhanced magnetic resonance angiography for pulmonary embolism: a multicenter prospective study (PIOPED III). Ann. Intern. Med. 2010; 152: 434–443.
(check this in PDF content)
51
Rooij W.J., den Heeten G.J., Sluzewski M.Pulmonary embolism: diagnosis in 211 patients with use of selective pulmonary digital subtraction angiography with a flowdirected catheter. Radiology 1995; 195: 793–797.
(check this in PDF content)
52
Forauer A.R., McLean G.K., Wallace L.P. Clinical follow-up of patients after a negative digital subtraction pulmonary arteriogram in the evaluation of pulmonary embolism. J. Vasc. Interv. Radiol. 1998; 9: 903–908.
(check this in PDF content)
53
Henry J.W., Relyea B., Stein P.D. Continuing risk of thromboemboli among patients with normal pulmonary angiograms. Chest 1995; 107: 1375–1378.
(check this in PDF content)
54
Wittram C., Waltman A.C., Shepard J.A. et al.Discordance between CT and angiography in the PIOPED II study. Radiology 2007; 244: 883–889.
(check this in PDF content)
55
Hurwitz L.M., Yoshizumi T., Reiman R.E. et al.Radiation dose to the fetus from body MDCT during early gestation. Am. J. Roentgenol. 2006; 186: 871–876.
(check this in PDF content)
56
Winer*Muram H.T., Boone J.M., Brown H.L. et al. Pulmonary embolism in pregnant patients: fetal radiation dose with helical CT. Radiology 2002; 224: 487–492.
(check this in PDF content)
57
Committee to Assess Health Risks from Exposure to Low Levels of Ionizing Radiation NRC. Health risks from exposure to low levels of ionizing radiation: BEIR VII – Phase 2. National Academy of Sciences; 2006.
(check this in PDF content)
58
Parker M.S., Hui F.K., Camacho M.A. et al.Female breast radiation exposure during CT pulmonary angiography. Am. J. Roentgenol. 2005; 185: 1228–1233.
(check this in PDF content)
59
Cook J.V., Kyriou J.Radiation from CT and perfusion scanning in pregnancy. Br. Med. J. 2005; 331: 350.
(check this in PDF content)
60
Hurwitz L.M., Yoshizumi T.T., Reiman R.E. et al. Radiation dose to the female breast from 16-MDCT body protocols. Am. J. Roentgenol. 2006; 186: 1718–1722.
(check this in PDF content)
61
International Commission on Radiological Protection. Radiation dose to patients from radiopharmaceuticals: Publication 53. Ann. ICRP 1987; 18: 1–377.
(check this in PDF content)
62
International Commission on Radiological Protection. Radiation dose to patients from radiopharmaceuticals: Publication 80 (addendum 2 to ICRP publication 53). Ann. ICRP 1998; 28: 1–126.
(check this in PDF content)
63
Hurwitz L.M., Reiman R.E., Yoshizumi T.T. et al. Radiation dose from contemporary cardiothoracic multidetector CT protocols with an anthropomorphic female phantom: implications for cancer induction. Radiology 2007; 245: 742–750.
(check this in PDF content)
64
Brenner D.J., Doll R., Goodhead D.T. et al.Cancer risks attributable to low doses of ionizing radiation: assessing what we really know. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 2003; 100: 13761–13766.
(check this in PDF content)
65
McCullough L.B., Chervenak F.A. Ethics in obstetrics and gynecology. New York: Oxford University Press; 1994.
(check this in PDF content)
66
Schaefer*Prokop C., Prokop M.CTPA for the diagnosis of acute pulmonary embolism during pregnancy. Eur. Radiol. 2008; 18: 2705–2708.
(check this in PDF content)
67
Kearon C., Kahn S.R., Agnelli G. et al.Antithrombotic therapy for venous thromboembolic disease: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines (8th Edition). Chest 2008; 133: 454S–545S.
(check this in PDF content)
68
Kline J.A., Hernandez*Nino J., Jones A.E. et al. Prospective study of the clinical features and outcomes of emergency department patients with delayed diagnosis of pulmonary embolism. Acad. Emerg. Med. 2007; 14: 592–598.
(check this in PDF content)
69
Smith S.B., Geske J.B., Maguire J.M. et al.Early anticoagulation is associated with reduced mortality for acute pulmonary embolism. Chest 2010; 137: 1382–1390.
(check this in PDF content)
70
Sostman H.D., Coleman R.E., DeLong D.M. et al. Evaluation of revised criteria for ventilation-perfusion scintigraphy in patients with suspected pulmonary embolism. Radiology 1994; 193: 103–107.
(check this in PDF content)
71
Sostman H.D., Miniati M., Gottschalk A. et al. Sensitivity and specificity of perfusion scintigraphy combined with chest radiography for acute pulmonary embolism in PIOPED II. J. Nucl. Med. 2008; 49: 1741–1748. Поступила 02.04.12
(check this in PDF content)