The 21 references in paper V. Polovinkin V., P. Pryn S., V. Sapsay V., В. Половинкин В., П. Прынь С., В. Сапсай В. (2016) “МОБИЛИЗАЦИЯ СЕЛЕЗЕНОЧНОГО ИЗГИБА ПРИ ПЕРЕДНИХ РЕЗЕКЦИЯХ ПРЯМОЙ КИШКИ ПО ПОВОДУ РАКА: БЕЗОПАСНОСТЬ И ОНКОЛОГИЧЕСКАЯ ОБОСНОВАННОСТЬ // SPLENIC FLEXURE MOBILIZATION DURING ANTERIOR RESECTION OF THE RECTUM FOR CANCER: SAFETY AND CANCER VALIDITY” / spz:neicon:ksma:y:2016:i:4:p:134-141

1
Справочник по классификации злокачественных опухолей. Официальные рекомендации Американской объединенной комиссии по злокачественным новообразованиям / Перевод с английского. – СПб: Медакадемия, 2007. – 432 с.
(check this in PDF content)
2
Biondo S., Kreisler E., Fraccalvieri D. et al. Risk factors for surgical site infection after elective resection for rectal cancer. A multivariate analysis on 2131 patients // Colorectal dis. – 2012. – Vol. 14. No 3. – P. 95–102.
(check this in PDF content)
3
Brennan D. J., Moynagh M., Brannigan A. E., et al. Routine mobilization of the splenic flexure is not necessary during anterior resection for rectal cancer // Dis. colon. rectum. – 2007. – No 3 (50). – P. 302–307.
(check this in PDF content)
4
Dixon A. R., Maxwell W. A., Holmes J. T. Carcinoma of the rectum: a 10-year experience // Br. j. surg. – 1991. – No 3 (78). – Р. 308–311.
(check this in PDF content)
5
Gouvas N., Gogos-Pappas G., Tsimogiannis K. et al. Impact of splenic flexure mobilization on short-term outcomes after laparoscopic left colectomy for colorectal cancer // Surg. laparosc. endosc. percutan. tech. – 2014. – No 5 (24). – P. 470–474.
(check this in PDF content)
6
Gravante G., Parker R., Elshaer M. et al. Lymph node retrieval for colorectal cancer: Estimation of the minimum resection length to achieve at least 12 lymph nodes for the pathological analysis // Int. j. surg. – 2016. – No 6 (25). – Р 153–157.
(check this in PDF content)
7
Hall N. R., Finan P. J., Stephenson B. M. et al. High tie of the inferior mesenteric artery in distal colorectal resec- tions – a safe vascular procedure // Int. j. colorectal. dis. – 1995. – No 1 (10). – P. 29–32.
(check this in PDF content)
8
Hallbook O., Johansson K., Sjodahl R. Laser Doppler blood flow measurement in rectal resection for carcinoma-comparison between the straight and colonic J pouch reconstruction // Br. j. surg. – 1996. – No 3 (83). – P. 389–392.
(check this in PDF content)
9
Hassan I., Pacheco P. E., Markwell S. J., Ahad S. Additional procedures performed during elective colon surgery and their adverse impact on postoperative outcomes // J. gastrointest. surg. – 2015. – No 3 (19). – Р 527–534.
(check this in PDF content)
10
Hiranyakas A., Da Silva G., Denoya P. et al. Colorectal anastomotic stricture: is it associated with inadequate colonic mobilization? // Tech. coloproctol. – 2013. – No 4 (17). – Р. 371–375.
(check this in PDF content)
11
International union against cancer (UICC). TNM classification of malignant tumours / Edited by Leslie H. Sobin and christian wittekind. – New York: Wiley-Liss, 2002. – 6th ed. – 264 p.
(check this in PDF content)
12
Karanjia N. D., Corder A. P., Bearn P., Heald R. J. Leakage from stapled low anastomosis after total mesorectal excision for carcinoma of the rectum // Br. j. surg. – 1994. – No 8 (81). – Р. 1224–1226.
(check this in PDF content)
13
Katory M., Tang C. L., Koh W. L. et al. A 6-year review of surgical morbidity and oncological outcome after high anterior resection for colorectal malignancy with and without splenic flexure mobilization // Colorectal. dis. – 2008. – No 2 (10). – P 165–169.
(check this in PDF content)
14
Kennedy R., Jenkins I. The case against mandatory mobilisation of the splenic flexure in left colonic and rectal malig- nancy // An. R col. surg. engl. – 2008. – No 8 (90). – Р. 638–640.
(check this in PDF content)
15
Konishi T., Watanabe T., Kishimoto J. et al. Elective colon and rectal surgery differ in risk factors for wound infection: results of prospective surveillance // An. surg. – 2006. – Vol. 244. No 5. – Р 758–763.
(check this in PDF content)
16
Kye B. H., Kim H. J., Kim H. S. et al. How much colonic redundancy could be obtained by splenic flexure mobilization in laparoscopic anterior or low anterior resection? // Int. j. med. sci. – 2014. – No 9 (11). – Р. 857–862.
(check this in PDF content)
17
Marsden M. R., Conti J. A., Zeidan S. et al. The selective use of splenic flexure mobilization is safe in both laparoscopic and open anterior resections // Colorectal. dis. – 2012. – No 10 (14). – P. 1255–1261.
(check this in PDF content)
18
Rullier E., Laurent C., Garrelon J. L. et al. Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after resection of rectal cancer // Br. j. surg. – 1998. – No 2 (85). – P. 355–358.
(check this in PDF content)
19
Stracci F., Bianconi F., Leite S. et al. Linking surgical specimen length and examined lymph nodes in colorectal cancer patients // Surgical oncology. – 2016. – No 2 (42). – P. 260–265.
(check this in PDF content)
20
Titu L. V., Tweedle E., Rooney P. S. High tie of the inferior mesenteric artery in curative surgery for left colonic and rectal cancers: a systematic review // Dig. surg. – 2008. – No 2 (25). – Р. 148–157.
(check this in PDF content)
21
Yamamoto S., Fujita S., Akasu T. et al. Wound infection after elective laparoscopic surgery for colorectal carcinoma // Surg. endosc. – 2007. – Vol. 21. No 12. – P. 2248–2252. Поступила 04.07.2016 УДК 616-001.4-002.3]-089:546.573
(check this in PDF content)