The 3 reference contexts in paper Christopher F. Baum, Nicholas J. Cox () “Metadata for user-written contributions to the Stata programming language” / RePEc:tsj:stbull:y:2000:v:9:i:52:ip29

  1. Start
    165763
    Prefix
    Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice–Hall. sg123Hodges–Lehmann estimation of a shift in location between two populations Duolao Wang, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine,UK, Duolao.Wang@lshtm.ac.uk Introduction The Hodges–Lehmann method (Hodges and Lehmann 1963;
    Exact
    Lehmann 1975)
    Suffix
    is a nonparametric procedure that extends the Wilcoxon–Mann–Whitney test to the problem of estimating the shift parameter between two populations. This method gives both a point estimate and a confidence interval for the shift parameter.
    (check this in PDF content)

  2. Start
    168302
    Prefix
    :[0,4] ----------------------------------------------------------------Methods and Formulas The Hodges–Lehmann method is an extension of the Wilcoxon–Mann–Whitney test to the problem of estimating the shift parameter (by a median unbiased estimate and a confidence interval). The Hodges–Lehmann estimates were developed by Hodges and Lehmann (1963) and are described in detail in
    Exact
    Hollander and Wolfe (1973, 75–82)
    Suffix
    –82), and in Lehmann (1975, 81–95). Suppose, that we have two samples of data. Sample 1 consists ofmobservations,x1;:::;xmdrawn from the distributionF(x), and sample 2 consists ofnobservations,y1;:::;yndrawn from the distributionG(y).
    (check this in PDF content)

  3. Start
    168344
    Prefix
    Methods and Formulas The Hodges–Lehmann method is an extension of the Wilcoxon–Mann–Whitney test to the problem of estimating the shift parameter (by a median unbiased estimate and a confidence interval). The Hodges–Lehmann estimates were developed by Hodges and Lehmann (1963) and are described in detail in Hollander and Wolfe (1973, 75–82), and in
    Exact
    Lehmann (1975, 81–95)
    Suffix
    –95). Suppose, that we have two samples of data. Sample 1 consists ofmobservations,x1;:::;xmdrawn from the distributionF(x), and sample 2 consists ofnobservations,y1;:::;yndrawn from the distributionG(y).
    (check this in PDF content)