The 24 references with contexts in paper Christopher F. Baum, Dorothea Schäfer, Oleksandr Talavera (2008) “The Impact of the Financial System's Structure on Firms' Financial Constraints” / RePEc:boc:bocoec:690

1
Acharya, V. V., Almeida, H., Campello, M., October 2007. Is cash negative debt? A hedging perspective on corporate financial policies. Journal of Financial Intermediation 16 (4), 515–554.
Total in-text references: 1
  1. In-text reference with the coordinate start=16197
    Prefix
    The average (median) liquidity ratio (Cash) for our sample is 13.07% (8.49%) and the average (median) value of the CashF lowratio is 11.42 (9.09). These values ofCashF loware comparable to those in Table 2 of
    Exact
    Acharya et al. (2007).
    Suffix
    8 The country-level measures that we use in our empirical analysis are constructed from the Financial Structure Database of Beck et al. (2000),updated in 2007.9The initial data are from 1960 to 2006. For each country-year, wecompute two different measures of financial structure:StructureActivity, log(total value traded ratio/bank credit ratio) andStructureSize, log(market capitalization ratio/bank

2
Allen, F., Gale, D., 2000. Comparing Financial Systems. MITPress.
Total in-text references: 1
  1. In-text reference with the coordinate start=28051
    Prefix
    Taking into account that monitoring is able toresolve some of the agency problems associated with raising funds, firms may enjoy better access to funds when monitored by banks rather than by the market. As argued by
    Exact
    Allen and Gale (2000),
    Suffix
    banks have a comparative advantage in selecting investmentprojects based on established technologies. This feature is typical of the manufacturing firms which we study. 5. Conclusions By taking into account country-level financial architecture, we advance our understanding of differences in the severity of the financial constraints facing firms.

3
Almeida, H., Campello, M., 2002. Financial constraints andinvestment-cash flow sensitivities: New research directions. Working paper, New YorkUniversity.
Total in-text references: 1
  1. In-text reference with the coordinate start=6595
    Prefix
    , as they find that “those firms classified as less financially constrained exhibit a significantly greater investment–cash flow sensitivity than those firms classified as more financially constrained” (p.169).2This debate was further fueled by the investigations of Fazzari et al. (2000) and Kaplan and Zingales (2000). Doubts about the measurement of financial constraints brought forth
    Exact
    Almeida and Campello (2002)and Moyen (2004),
    Suffix
    which broaden the analysis from the traditional cash flow–investment paradigms. The innovative approach of Almeida et al. (2004) is based on the concept that scrutiny of the firm’s financial management should indicate financial market imperfections earlier and more clearly than the observed path of capital investment expenditures, which typically exhibits time-to-build lags.

4
Almeida, H., Campello, M., Weisbach, M., 2004. The cash flow sensitivity of cash. Journal of Finance 59 (4), 1777–1804.
Total in-text references: 7
  1. In-text reference with the coordinate start=527
    Prefix
    Oleksandr Talaverac aDepartment of Economics, Boston College, Chestnut Hill, MA02467 USA bDIW Berlin, Mohrenstraße 58, 10117 Berlin cSchool of Economics, University of East Anglia, Norwich NR47TJ, UK Abstract We estimate firms’ cash flow sensitivity of cash to empirically test how the financial system’s structure and activity level influence their financialconstraints. For this purpose we merge
    Exact
    Almeida et al. (2004),
    Suffix
    a path-breaking design for evaluating a firm’s financial constraints, with Levine (2002), who paved the way for comparative analysis of financial systems around the world. We conjecture that a country’s financial system, both in terms of its structure and its level of development, should influence the cash flow sensitivity of cash of constrained firms but leave unconstrained firms unaffected.

  2. In-text reference with the coordinate start=3591
    Prefix
    While the traditional definition of financial constraints defined in terms of investment–cash flow sensitivity is highly controversial (e.g. Fazzari et al. (1988) and Kaplan and Zingales (1997)), we follow the recently developed approach of
    Exact
    Almeida et al. (2004).
    Suffix
    They consider a firm as financially constrained if it accumulates cash out of its cash flow. Second, we interact cash flow with proxies for the country-specific financial structure. The latter measures reflect the relative importance (measured by activity or size) of the stock market compared to that of the banking sys2 tem (Levine (2002)).

  3. In-text reference with the coordinate start=6745
    Prefix
    Doubts about the measurement of financial constraints brought forth Almeida and Campello (2002)and Moyen (2004), which broaden the analysis from the traditional cash flow–investment paradigms. The innovative approach of
    Exact
    Almeida et al. (2004)
    Suffix
    is based on the concept that scrutiny of the firm’s financial management should indicate financial market imperfections earlier and more clearly than the observed path of capital investment expenditures, which typically exhibits time-to-build lags.

  4. In-text reference with the coordinate start=7493
    Prefix
    Along these lines they study the relationship between the firm’s generated cash flow and its cash balances. Data on US firms reveal that financially constrained firms exhibit a relatively higher propensity to save cash out of their cash flows. A natural question is, therefore, whether the results of
    Exact
    Almeida et al. (2004)
    Suffix
    are country-specific. Country-comparison studies on the relation between financial constraints and the financial environment are few in number and are exclusively based on the traditional proxy for external financing restrictions:the cash flow sensitivity of capital investment expenditures.

  5. In-text reference with the coordinate start=10516
    Prefix
    Model Design To investigate whether firms’ obstacles in obtaining external funds are affected by the country’s financial system we must model how financial constraints are related to indicators of financial system structure.
    Exact
    Almeida et al. (2004)
    Suffix
    develop a basic econometric model which links firms’ stocks of cash to their cash flow. A firm is considered asfinancially constrainedif it builds up its stock of cash out of its cash flow. Their theoretical and empirical model is well suited for our purpose after augmenting their basic specification with country-level attributes of financial markets.

  6. In-text reference with the coordinate start=20606
    Prefix
    Based on the point estimates, smaller (constrained) firms are highly sensitive to the changes in cash flow, while larger, unconstrained firms display a considerably lower sensitivity. The greater sensitivity of small firms supports the conjecture that smaller firms are more likely to be financially constrained, in line with results reported by
    Exact
    Almeida et al. (2004).
    Suffix
    The direct effect of theStructureActivitymeasure is negative and insignificant, but the indirect effects of the measure, interacted withCashF low, are significantly positive, increasing the cash flow sensitivity for small firms in more market-oriented financial systems.

  7. In-text reference with the coordinate start=28526
    Prefix
    Conclusions By taking into account country-level financial architecture, we advance our understanding of differences in the severity of the financial constraints facing firms. We approach the empirical challenge in light of the recently proposed theoretical framework developed by
    Exact
    Almeida et al. (2004),
    Suffix
    in which a firm is considered as financially con14 strained if it retains cash out of its cash flow. We augment thecash holdings–cash flow sensitivity link with country-level indices of relative development of the stock market to the development of the banking system.

6
Bond, S., Elston, J. A., Mairesse, J., Mulkay, B., 09 2003. Financial factors and investment in Belgium, France, Germany, and the United Kingdom: A comparison using company panel data. The Review of Economics and Statistics 85 (1), 153–165.
Total in-text references: 1
  1. In-text reference with the coordinate start=8488
    Prefix
    They find that both types of investment are more strongly affected by cash flow for US companies operating in a market-based financial environment compared to the firms located in the bank-based (Japanese) or mixed (French)financial systems. Similar evidence is found in results from Bond et al. (1999)) for German (bank-based) and British (market-based) financial systems. In addition,
    Exact
    Bond et al. (2003)
    Suffix
    confirm the finding of a higher cash flow sensitivity (stronger financing restrictions) in market-based financial systems employing data for Belgian, French, German and British companies. However, to the best of our knowledge, evidence on how the financial architecture affects a less ambiguous indicator for the existence of financial constraints—the cash flow sensitivity of cash—has not been produ

7
Bond, S., Harhoff, D., Reenen, J. V., 1999. Investment, R&D and financial constraints in Britain and Germany. Working Papers WP99/5, Institute for Fiscal Studies.
Total in-text references: 1
  1. In-text reference with the coordinate start=8386
    Prefix
    They find that both types of investment are more strongly affected by cash flow for US companies operating in a market-based financial environment compared to the firms located in the bank-based (Japanese) or mixed (French)financial systems. Similar evidence is found in results from
    Exact
    Bond et al. (1999))
    Suffix
    for German (bank-based) and British (market-based) financial systems. In addition, Bond et al. (2003) confirm the finding of a higher cash flow sensitivity (stronger financing restrictions) in market-based financial systems employing data for Belgian, French, German and British companies.

8
Chakraborty, S., Ray, T., March 2006. Bank-based versus market-based financial systems: A growth-theoretic analysis. Journal of Monetary Economics 53 (2), 329–350.
Total in-text references: 1
  1. In-text reference with the coordinate start=27660
    Prefix
    The evidence in Tables 4–6 indicate the existence of tighterfinancial constraints for firms operating in market-based financial systems and a negative relationship between financial development and the severity of financial constraints. In a theoretical study,
    Exact
    Chakraborty and Ray (2006)
    Suffix
    suggest that a bank-based financial system encourages participation in production activities and provides funding to a larger number of entrepreneurs. Taking into account that monitoring is able toresolve some of the agency problems associated with raising funds, firms may enjoy better access to funds when monitored by banks rather than by the market.

9
Cleary, S., 04 1999. The relationship between firm investment and financial status. Journal of Finance 54 (2), 673–692.
Total in-text references: 1
  1. In-text reference with the coordinate start=7956
    Prefix
    on the relation between financial constraints and the financial environment are few in number and are exclusively based on the traditional proxy for external financing restrictions:the cash flow sensitivity of capital investment expenditures. For instance, Mairesse et al. (1999) examine the cash flow 1See also Gilchrist and Himmelberg (1996) and Hoshi et al. (1991). 2For instance, see also
    Exact
    Cleary (1999), Gomes (2001), and Cummings et al. (2006).
    Suffix
    4 sensitivity of equipment and R&D investments of American, French and Japanese companies. They find that both types of investment are more strongly affected by cash flow for US companies operating in a market-based financial environment compared to the firms located in the bank-based (Japanese) or mixed (French)financial systems.

10
Cummings, J. G., Hassett, K. A., Oliner, S. D., June 2006. Investment behavior, observable expectations, and internal funds. American Economic Review 96 (3), 796–810. Demirg ̈u ̧c-Kunt, A., Maksimovic, V., September 2002. Funding growth in bank-based and market-based financial systems: evidence from firm-level data. Journal of Financial Economics 65 (3), 337–363.
Total in-text references: 1
  1. In-text reference with the coordinate start=7956
    Prefix
    on the relation between financial constraints and the financial environment are few in number and are exclusively based on the traditional proxy for external financing restrictions:the cash flow sensitivity of capital investment expenditures. For instance, Mairesse et al. (1999) examine the cash flow 1See also Gilchrist and Himmelberg (1996) and Hoshi et al. (1991). 2For instance, see also
    Exact
    Cleary (1999), Gomes (2001), and Cummings et al. (2006).
    Suffix
    4 sensitivity of equipment and R&D investments of American, French and Japanese companies. They find that both types of investment are more strongly affected by cash flow for US companies operating in a market-based financial environment compared to the firms located in the bank-based (Japanese) or mixed (French)financial systems.

11
Fazzari, S., Hubbard, R. G., Petersen, B. C., 1988. Financing constraints and corporate investment. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity 78 (2), 141–195. 17
Total in-text references: 3
  1. In-text reference with the coordinate start=3493
    Prefix
    To address this issue, we begin by observing the liquidity policy of firms and relating it to the degree of financial frictions. While the traditional definition of financial constraints defined in terms of investment–cash flow sensitivity is highly controversial (e.g.
    Exact
    Fazzari et al. (1988) and Kaplan and Zingales (1997)),
    Suffix
    we follow the recently developed approach of Almeida et al. (2004). They consider a firm as financially constrained if it accumulates cash out of its cash flow. Second, we interact cash flow with proxies for the country-specific financial structure.

  2. In-text reference with the coordinate start=5771
    Prefix
    Literature Review Researchers have expended considerable effort in trying to understand the nature of financial constraints faced by firms. Information asymmetry, moral hazard and agency conflicts negatively affect the firm’s borrowing capacity, which may cause an underinvestment problem.
    Exact
    Fazzari et al. (1988)
    Suffix
    initiate a new stream of literature on financial constraints and propose to employ a measure of investment-cash flow sensitivity as a 3 gauge of financial frictions. If firms’ access to external capital markets is limited, their reliance on internal resources implies that internally generated cash flows will influence their investment path.1 However, Kaplan and Zingales (1997) argue that these res

  3. In-text reference with the coordinate start=18363
    Prefix
    The empirical literature investigating firms’ capital structure behavior has utilized 9These data were accessed from http://go.worldbank.org/X23UD9QUX0 in March 2008. 9 various indicators of financial constraints. In line with previous research (e.g.,
    Exact
    Fazzari et al. (1988), Gilchrist and Himmelberg (1996))
    Suffix
    we assume that small firms and firms with low (or zero) dividend payout ratios are those most likely to face binding financial constraints. Conversely, larger firms and those with high dividend payout ratios are much less likely to face credit rationing.

12
Fazzari, S. M., Hubbard, R. G., Petersen, B. C., May 2000. Investment-cash flow sensitivities are useful: A comment on Kaplan and Zingales. TheQuarterly Journal of Economics 115 (2), 695–705.
Total in-text references: 1
  1. In-text reference with the coordinate start=6473
    Prefix
    cash flows will influence their investment path.1 However, Kaplan and Zingales (1997) argue that these results are controversial, as they find that “those firms classified as less financially constrained exhibit a significantly greater investment–cash flow sensitivity than those firms classified as more financially constrained” (p.169).2This debate was further fueled by the investigations of
    Exact
    Fazzari et al. (2000) and Kaplan and Zingales (2000).
    Suffix
    Doubts about the measurement of financial constraints brought forth Almeida and Campello (2002)and Moyen (2004), which broaden the analysis from the traditional cash flow–investment paradigms. The innovative approach of Almeida et al. (2004) is based on the concept that scrutiny of the firm’s financial management should indicate financial market imperfections earlier and more clearly than the obse

13
Gilchrist, S., Himmelberg, C., 1996. Evidence on the role ofcash flow for investment. Journal of Monetary Economics 36, 541–572.
Total in-text references: 2
  1. In-text reference with the coordinate start=7876
    Prefix
    Country-comparison studies on the relation between financial constraints and the financial environment are few in number and are exclusively based on the traditional proxy for external financing restrictions:the cash flow sensitivity of capital investment expenditures. For instance, Mairesse et al. (1999) examine the cash flow 1See also
    Exact
    Gilchrist and Himmelberg (1996) and Hoshi et al. (1991).
    Suffix
    2For instance, see also Cleary (1999), Gomes (2001), and Cummings et al. (2006). 4 sensitivity of equipment and R&D investments of American, French and Japanese companies. They find that both types of investment are more strongly affected by cash flow for US companies operating in a market-based financial environment compared to the firms located in the bank-based (Japanese) or mixed (French)finan

  2. In-text reference with the coordinate start=18363
    Prefix
    The empirical literature investigating firms’ capital structure behavior has utilized 9These data were accessed from http://go.worldbank.org/X23UD9QUX0 in March 2008. 9 various indicators of financial constraints. In line with previous research (e.g.,
    Exact
    Fazzari et al. (1988), Gilchrist and Himmelberg (1996))
    Suffix
    we assume that small firms and firms with low (or zero) dividend payout ratios are those most likely to face binding financial constraints. Conversely, larger firms and those with high dividend payout ratios are much less likely to face credit rationing.

14
Gomes, J. F., December 2001. Financing investment. American Economic Review 91 (5), 1263–1285.
Total in-text references: 1
  1. In-text reference with the coordinate start=7956
    Prefix
    on the relation between financial constraints and the financial environment are few in number and are exclusively based on the traditional proxy for external financing restrictions:the cash flow sensitivity of capital investment expenditures. For instance, Mairesse et al. (1999) examine the cash flow 1See also Gilchrist and Himmelberg (1996) and Hoshi et al. (1991). 2For instance, see also
    Exact
    Cleary (1999), Gomes (2001), and Cummings et al. (2006).
    Suffix
    4 sensitivity of equipment and R&D investments of American, French and Japanese companies. They find that both types of investment are more strongly affected by cash flow for US companies operating in a market-based financial environment compared to the firms located in the bank-based (Japanese) or mixed (French)financial systems.

15
Harford, J., December 1999. Corporate cash reserves and acquisitions. Journal of Finance 54 (6), 1969–1997.
Total in-text references: 1
  1. In-text reference with the coordinate start=13088
    Prefix
    It is measured as the natural log of the market capitalization ratio (stock market capitalization/GDP) to the bank credit ratio.7 The elements ofXare intended to control for a firm’s financial characteristics that influence their managers’ liquidity policy. The choice of variables is motivated by prior research on the determinants of cash holdings (e.g.,
    Exact
    Opler et al. (1999) and Harford (1999)),
    Suffix
    subject to data availability. To control for economies of scale in cash management, we include the natural log of assets,Size, as a measure of firm size. As Global COMPUSTATdoes not include the information needed to construct Tobin’sQ(e.g., number of shares outstanding and stock price), we employ theratio of future investment to current investment,LeadInvestment, as a measure of the firm’s investm

16
Hoshi, T., Kashyap, A., Scharfstein, D., February 1991. Corporate structure, liquidity, and investment: Evidence from Japanese industrial groups.The Quarterly Journal of Economics 106 (1), 33–60.
Total in-text references: 1
  1. In-text reference with the coordinate start=7876
    Prefix
    Country-comparison studies on the relation between financial constraints and the financial environment are few in number and are exclusively based on the traditional proxy for external financing restrictions:the cash flow sensitivity of capital investment expenditures. For instance, Mairesse et al. (1999) examine the cash flow 1See also
    Exact
    Gilchrist and Himmelberg (1996) and Hoshi et al. (1991).
    Suffix
    2For instance, see also Cleary (1999), Gomes (2001), and Cummings et al. (2006). 4 sensitivity of equipment and R&D investments of American, French and Japanese companies. They find that both types of investment are more strongly affected by cash flow for US companies operating in a market-based financial environment compared to the firms located in the bank-based (Japanese) or mixed (French)finan

17
Kaplan, S. N., Zingales, L., 1997. Do investment-cash flow sensitivities provide useful measures of financing constraints. Quarterly Journal of Economics 107 (1), 196–215.
Total in-text references: 2
  1. In-text reference with the coordinate start=3493
    Prefix
    To address this issue, we begin by observing the liquidity policy of firms and relating it to the degree of financial frictions. While the traditional definition of financial constraints defined in terms of investment–cash flow sensitivity is highly controversial (e.g.
    Exact
    Fazzari et al. (1988) and Kaplan and Zingales (1997)),
    Suffix
    we follow the recently developed approach of Almeida et al. (2004). They consider a firm as financially constrained if it accumulates cash out of its cash flow. Second, we interact cash flow with proxies for the country-specific financial structure.

  2. In-text reference with the coordinate start=6140
    Prefix
    Fazzari et al. (1988) initiate a new stream of literature on financial constraints and propose to employ a measure of investment-cash flow sensitivity as a 3 gauge of financial frictions. If firms’ access to external capital markets is limited, their reliance on internal resources implies that internally generated cash flows will influence their investment path.1 However,
    Exact
    Kaplan and Zingales (1997)
    Suffix
    argue that these results are controversial, as they find that “those firms classified as less financially constrained exhibit a significantly greater investment–cash flow sensitivity than those firms classified as more financially constrained” (p.169).2This debate was further fueled by the investigations of Fazzari et al. (2000) and Kaplan and Zingales (2000).

18
Kaplan, S. N., Zingales, L., May 2000. Investment-cash flow sensitivities are not valid measures of financing constraints. The Quarterly Journal ofEconomics 115 (2), 707– 712.
Total in-text references: 1
  1. In-text reference with the coordinate start=6473
    Prefix
    cash flows will influence their investment path.1 However, Kaplan and Zingales (1997) argue that these results are controversial, as they find that “those firms classified as less financially constrained exhibit a significantly greater investment–cash flow sensitivity than those firms classified as more financially constrained” (p.169).2This debate was further fueled by the investigations of
    Exact
    Fazzari et al. (2000) and Kaplan and Zingales (2000).
    Suffix
    Doubts about the measurement of financial constraints brought forth Almeida and Campello (2002)and Moyen (2004), which broaden the analysis from the traditional cash flow–investment paradigms. The innovative approach of Almeida et al. (2004) is based on the concept that scrutiny of the firm’s financial management should indicate financial market imperfections earlier and more clearly than the obse

19
Khurana, I. K., Martin, X., Pereira, R., December 2006. Financial development and the cash flow sensitivity of cash. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 41 (4), 787–807.
Total in-text references: 1
  1. In-text reference with the coordinate start=10051
    Prefix
    based on similar empirical methodologies. 3See Levine (2002) for a detailed review of the literature describing differences of market-based and bank-based financial systems. 4Using firm level data, Demirg ̈u ̧c-Kunt and Maksimovic (2002) find that financial development is robustly linked with access to external markets, but there is no support for either the bank-based or market-based view. 5
    Exact
    Khurana et al. (2006)
    Suffix
    study the linkage between financial development and the cash flow sensitivity of cash, but they do not focus on the nature of a more highly developed financial system as we do in this study. 5 3. Empirical Implementation 3.1.

20
Levine, R., October 2002. Bank-based or market-based financial systems: Which is better? Journal of Financial Intermediation 11 (4), 398–428.
Total in-text references: 6
  1. In-text reference with the coordinate start=624
    Prefix
    , Mohrenstraße 58, 10117 Berlin cSchool of Economics, University of East Anglia, Norwich NR47TJ, UK Abstract We estimate firms’ cash flow sensitivity of cash to empirically test how the financial system’s structure and activity level influence their financialconstraints. For this purpose we merge Almeida et al. (2004), a path-breaking design for evaluating a firm’s financial constraints, with
    Exact
    Levine (2002),
    Suffix
    who paved the way for comparative analysis of financial systems around the world. We conjecture that a country’s financial system, both in terms of its structure and its level of development, should influence the cash flow sensitivity of cash of constrained firms but leave unconstrained firms unaffected.

  2. In-text reference with the coordinate start=3937
    Prefix
    Second, we interact cash flow with proxies for the country-specific financial structure. The latter measures reflect the relative importance (measured by activity or size) of the stock market compared to that of the banking sys2 tem
    Exact
    (Levine (2002)).
    Suffix
    Finally, we consider whether our results are robust after controlling for the level of development of the financial system. We employ annual firm-level manufacturing sector data obtained from GlobalCOMPUSTAT.

  3. In-text reference with the coordinate start=4808
    Prefix
    Our empirical model quantifies the degree to which the effects of cash flow on cash may be strengthened or weakened by the structure of the financial system. We observe that companies located in marketbased financial systems are more likely to be financially constrained. In contrast to earlier research such as
    Exact
    Levine (2002),
    Suffix
    we find a significant role for financial structure while the level of financial development maintains its significance in explaining financial frictions. Hence, reduction of financial constraints, the main mechanism for turning stimuli from the financial sector into economic growth, depends on both the structure and the development of the financial system.

  4. In-text reference with the coordinate start=9708
    Prefix
    research has shown that financial development has an effect on the severity of financial constraints facing firms (Love (2003)), but there have been very few firm-level studies investigating the joint effect of structure and development on the degree of financial frictions.4,5A proper inquiry into this issue requires a cross-country approach based on similar empirical methodologies. 3See
    Exact
    Levine (2002)
    Suffix
    for a detailed review of the literature describing differences of market-based and bank-based financial systems. 4Using firm level data, Demirg ̈u ̧c-Kunt and Maksimovic (2002) find that financial development is robustly linked with access to external markets, but there is no support for either the bank-based or market-based view. 5Khurana et al. (2006) study the linkage between financial developm

  5. In-text reference with the coordinate start=12269
    Prefix
    constrained if its liquidity ratio is responsive to cash flows 6We replace missing values for income before extraordinary items by operating income minus operating expenses. 6 (∂(∆CashHoldings)/∂CashF low=α+β Structureit>0). In contrast, unconstrained firms are not expected to show a statistically significant relationship between the liquidity ratio and cash flow (α+β Structureit= 0). Following
    Exact
    Levine (2002),
    Suffix
    we make use of two different measures of financial structure: StructureActivityandStructureSize. The first indicator,StructureActivity, measures the activity of stock markets relative to that of banks.

  6. In-text reference with the coordinate start=24997
    Prefix
    Our further analysis is based on the specificationsintroduced in the previous section which we augment with a variable measuring the levelof financial development of the countries covered in the GlobalCOMPUSTATdataset. Following
    Exact
    Levine (2002),
    Suffix
    we employ two proxy measures for the strength of financial institutions. The first measure, F inanceActivity, is defined as log(bank credit ratio×total value traded ratio), while the second proxy,F inanceSize, is calculated as log(market capitalization ratio×bank credit ratio).11We present the descriptive statistics for these variables by country in Table 1.

21
Love, I., 2003. Financial development and financing constraints: International evidence from the structural investment model. Review of Financial Studies 16, 765–791.
Total in-text references: 3
  1. In-text reference with the coordinate start=9435
    Prefix
    A particularly interesting issue is whether the severity of obstacles in credit markets is correlated with the degree of a country’s financial development. Previous research has shown that financial development has an effect on the severity of financial constraints facing firms
    Exact
    (Love (2003)),
    Suffix
    but there have been very few firm-level studies investigating the joint effect of structure and development on the degree of financial frictions.4,5A proper inquiry into this issue requires a cross-country approach based on similar empirical methodologies. 3See Levine (2002) for a detailed review of the literature describing differences of market-based and bank-based financial systems. 4Using firm

  2. In-text reference with the coordinate start=24757
    Prefix
    Models augmented with Financial Development A concern with the regression results shown in Tables 4 and 5 is that they may present an incomplete picture, as not only the structure but also thelevel of a country’s financial development will affect the severity of financial constraints that firms face (e.g.,
    Exact
    Love (2003)).
    Suffix
    Our further analysis is based on the specificationsintroduced in the previous section which we augment with a variable measuring the levelof financial development of the countries covered in the GlobalCOMPUSTATdataset.

  3. In-text reference with the coordinate start=26225
    Prefix
    Manufacturing companies, facing difficulties in access to external funding, accumulate liquid assets as a cash buffer stock. The interaction term,CF×F inanceActivity, is negative and significant for those firms which area priorilabeled as financially constrained. This result confirms the findings of
    Exact
    Love (2003)
    Suffix
    who underlines the importance of financial development to 11Employing the private credit ratio (the value of financial intermediary credits to the private sector / GDP) instead of the bank credit ratio yields qualitativelysimilar results. 12Full results of the estimations are available from the authors upon request. 13 address obstacles in external financing.

22
Mairesse, J., Hall, B. H., Mulkay, B., Dec. 1999. Firm-levelinvestment in France and the United states: An exploration of what we have learned in twenty years. Nber working papers, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
Total in-text references: 1
  1. In-text reference with the coordinate start=7822
    Prefix
    Country-comparison studies on the relation between financial constraints and the financial environment are few in number and are exclusively based on the traditional proxy for external financing restrictions:the cash flow sensitivity of capital investment expenditures. For instance,
    Exact
    Mairesse et al. (1999)
    Suffix
    examine the cash flow 1See also Gilchrist and Himmelberg (1996) and Hoshi et al. (1991). 2For instance, see also Cleary (1999), Gomes (2001), and Cummings et al. (2006). 4 sensitivity of equipment and R&D investments of American, French and Japanese companies.

23
Moyen, N., October 2004. Investment–cash flow sensitivities: Constrained versus unconstrained firms. Journal of Finance 59 (5), 2061–2092. 18
Total in-text references: 1
  1. In-text reference with the coordinate start=6595
    Prefix
    , as they find that “those firms classified as less financially constrained exhibit a significantly greater investment–cash flow sensitivity than those firms classified as more financially constrained” (p.169).2This debate was further fueled by the investigations of Fazzari et al. (2000) and Kaplan and Zingales (2000). Doubts about the measurement of financial constraints brought forth
    Exact
    Almeida and Campello (2002)and Moyen (2004),
    Suffix
    which broaden the analysis from the traditional cash flow–investment paradigms. The innovative approach of Almeida et al. (2004) is based on the concept that scrutiny of the firm’s financial management should indicate financial market imperfections earlier and more clearly than the observed path of capital investment expenditures, which typically exhibits time-to-build lags.

24
Myers, S. C., 1977. Determinants of corporate borrowing. Journal of Financial Economics 25, 25–43.
Total in-text references: 1
  1. In-text reference with the coordinate start=23956
    Prefix
    When we turn to interpreting the effects of the cash flow sensitivity of cash for those firms hypothesized to be financially unconstrained, we find that their cash management is largelyinsensitive to cash flow. Furthermore, their sensitivity to their country’s financial architecture is essentially nil. [INSERT FIGURES 1,2 HERE] Our results are also in line with pecking order theory
    Exact
    (Myers(1977)),
    Suffix
    which suggests that firms prefer internal financing and try to maintain a stable dividend. If their generated cash flow is higher than capital expenditure, the firm may invest in liquid assets, andvice versa.

25
Opler, T., Pinkowitz, L., Stulz, R., Williamson, R., 1999. The determinants and implications of cash holdings. Journal of Financial Economics 52, 3–46. 19 Appendix 1: Data construction The following variables are used in the annual empirical study.
Total in-text references: 1
  1. In-text reference with the coordinate start=13088
    Prefix
    It is measured as the natural log of the market capitalization ratio (stock market capitalization/GDP) to the bank credit ratio.7 The elements ofXare intended to control for a firm’s financial characteristics that influence their managers’ liquidity policy. The choice of variables is motivated by prior research on the determinants of cash holdings (e.g.,
    Exact
    Opler et al. (1999) and Harford (1999)),
    Suffix
    subject to data availability. To control for economies of scale in cash management, we include the natural log of assets,Size, as a measure of firm size. As Global COMPUSTATdoes not include the information needed to construct Tobin’sQ(e.g., number of shares outstanding and stock price), we employ theratio of future investment to current investment,LeadInvestment, as a measure of the firm’s investm