The 14 reference contexts in paper John Barkoulas, Christopher F. Baum, Joseph Onochie (1996) “Nonlinear Nonparametric Prediction of the 90-Day T-Bill Rate” / RePEc:boc:bocoec:320

  1. Start
    1824
    Prefix
    Owners and managers of fixed income portfolios will find accurate forecasts essential. Despite the sizable body of research focusing on the term structure of interest rates, models based on the analytics of this relationship–whether arbitrage-based (e.g.
    Exact
    Merton (1973),
    Suffix
    Heath et al. (1992)) or of a general equilibrium nature (e.g. Cox et al. (1985a,b), Longstaff and Schwartz (1992))–have not proven to be reliable in the prediction of short-term interest rate movements.
    (check this in PDF content)

  2. Start
    4246
    Prefix
    From an empirical perspective, the presence of nonlinearities would form the basis for improved predictability of interest rates. Recent empirical research documents nonlinear dynamics both in the mean and in the variance of interest rates.
    Exact
    Hamilton (1988)
    Suffix
    applies a Markov switching model to U.S. short-term interest rate data and finds that this model fits the data better than a linear autoregressive model. Granger (1993) shows that the U.
    (check this in PDF content)

  3. Start
    4450
    Prefix
    Hamilton (1988) applies a Markov switching model to U.S. short-term interest rate data and finds that this model fits the data better than a linear autoregressive model.
    Exact
    Granger (1993)
    Suffix
    shows that the U.S. short-term interest rate depends in a nonlinear manner on the spread between long and short interest rates. Anderson (1994) provides additional evidence for the types of nonlinear effects reported in Granger.
    (check this in PDF content)

  4. Start
    4605
    Prefix
    Hamilton (1988) applies a Markov switching model to U.S. short-term interest rate data and finds that this model fits the data better than a linear autoregressive model. Granger (1993) shows that the U.S. short-term interest rate depends in a nonlinear manner on the spread between long and short interest rates.
    Exact
    Anderson (1994)
    Suffix
    provides additional evidence for the types of nonlinear effects reported in Granger. Kozicki (1994) finds asymmetry in the form of differing responses to positive and negative shocks.
    (check this in PDF content)

  5. Start
    4721
    Prefix
    Granger (1993) shows that the U.S. short-term interest rate depends in a nonlinear manner on the spread between long and short interest rates. Anderson (1994) provides additional evidence for the types of nonlinear effects reported in Granger.
    Exact
    Kozicki (1994)
    Suffix
    finds asymmetry in the form of differing responses to positive and negative shocks. Naik and Lee (1993) and Das (1993) link the nonlinearities to changes in economic regimes and stochastic jumps, respectively.
    (check this in PDF content)

  6. Start
    4873
    Prefix
    Anderson (1994) provides additional evidence for the types of nonlinear effects reported in Granger. Kozicki (1994) finds asymmetry in the form of differing responses to positive and negative shocks. Naik and Lee (1993) and
    Exact
    Das (1993)
    Suffix
    link the nonlinearities to changes in economic regimes and stochastic jumps, respectively. Finally, Pfann, Schotman, and Tscherning (1996) explore the scope of nonlinear dynamics in short-term interest rates and its implications for the term structure.
    (check this in PDF content)

  7. Start
    6527
    Prefix
    Therefore, the nonparametric approach avoids the parametric-model selection problem and allows for a wider array of nonlinear behavior. Following Diebold and
    Exact
    Nason (1990),
    Suffix
    we use the locally weighted regression method (henceforth LWR), a nonparametric estimation method, to model nonlinearities in mean returns of the 90-day U.S. T-bill rate. We measure the forecasting accurancy of our LWR model using both root mean square error (RMSE) and mean absolute deviation (MAD) criteria.
    (check this in PDF content)

  8. Start
    8058
    Prefix
    The Locally Weighted Regression (LWR) Method We attempt to uncover nonlinear relationships in the 90-day T-bill rate using the nonparametric locally weighted regression (LWR) method. LWR is a nearest-neighbor (NN) estimation technique, first introduced by
    Exact
    Cleveland (1979) and
    Suffix
    further developed by Cleveland and Devlin (1988) and Cleveland, Devlin, and Grosse (1988). It is a way of estimating a regression surface through a multivariate smoothing procedure, fitting a function of independent variables locally and in a moving-average manner.
    (check this in PDF content)

  9. Start
    10001
    Prefix
    To set the observation weights, we use the tricube weighting function wit=1−u 3 () 3 , where u≡ xit−t x∗ xq−t x∗ (3) The value of the regression surface at ∗x is then computed as y ˆ ∗=ˆ g ∗x ()=∗x ′ˆ ,(4) where n  2      .(5) ˆ =argmin wt t=1 ∑ty−tx′()
    Exact
    Stone (1977)
    Suffix
    formulated the problem of consistent estimation through regularity conditions on weights of the neighbors. Consistency of NN estimators (and therefore LWR) requires that the number of NNs used go to infinity with sample size, but at a slower rate, that is, as n→∞,q→∞,but -6q n→0.
    (check this in PDF content)

  10. Start
    12579
    Prefix
    T-bill rate changes are symmetric but leptokurtic. We first investigate the low-frequency properties of the T-Bill rate series. To do so, we apply the Phillips-Perron tests (PP)
    Exact
    (Phillips (1987),
    Suffix
    Phillips and Perron (1988)) to both levels and first differences of the T-bill rate. Table 2 presents the PP test results. Inference is robust to the order of serial correlation allowed in the data.
    (check this in PDF content)

  11. Start
    19476
    Prefix
    The in-sample and out-of-sample superior performance of the LWR methodology appears to be robust to autoregression order, window size, and forecasting measure. This evidence is much more encouraging than that found for exchange rates (Diebold and
    Exact
    Nason (1990),
    Suffix
    Meese and Rose (1990)) and stock returns (LeBaron (1988), Hsieh (1991)). Our results could be extended to multiple-step-ahead forecasting horizons. The empirical validity of the LWR methodology for other U.
    (check this in PDF content)

  12. Start
    19552
    Prefix
    The in-sample and out-of-sample superior performance of the LWR methodology appears to be robust to autoregression order, window size, and forecasting measure. This evidence is much more encouraging than that found for exchange rates (Diebold and Nason (1990), Meese and Rose (1990)) and stock returns (LeBaron (1988),
    Exact
    Hsieh (1991)).
    Suffix
    Our results could be extended to multiple-step-ahead forecasting horizons. The empirical validity of the LWR methodology for other U.S. interest rate series as well as for international interest rate series should also be investigated.
    (check this in PDF content)

  13. Start
    22293
    Prefix
    They recommend using between one-half to two times the standard deviation of the raw data. The accuracy of the asymptotic distribution deteriorates for high embedding dimensions, particularly when m is 10 and above. -14Endnotes 1
    Exact
    Sims (1984), Abel (1988), Hodrick (1987),
    Suffix
    Baldwin and Lyons (1988), and Nason (1988) have shown that economic theory does not rule out the possibility of nonlinear dependence in conditional means and higher-order conditional moments of asset returns. 2 The only exception was nonlinear autoregression of order one for which the performance of the LWR fit was inferior to linear fits. 3 Note that i.i.d. implies that
    (check this in PDF content)

  14. Start
    22375
    Prefix
    The accuracy of the asymptotic distribution deteriorates for high embedding dimensions, particularly when m is 10 and above. -14Endnotes 1 Sims (1984), Abel (1988), Hodrick (1987), Baldwin and Lyons (1988), and
    Exact
    Nason (1988)
    Suffix
    have shown that economic theory does not rule out the possibility of nonlinear dependence in conditional means and higher-order conditional moments of asset returns. 2 The only exception was nonlinear autoregression of order one for which the performance of the LWR fit was inferior to linear fits. 3 Note that i.i.d. implies that Cm,T()=1C,T() m but the converse is not tru
    (check this in PDF content)