spz:neicon:pimi:y:2016:i:2:p:136-144

1: Пантелеев, К.В. Построение измерителей контактной разности потенциалов / К.В. Пантелеев, В.А. Микитевич, А.Л. Жарин // Приборы и методы измерений. – 2016. – Т. 7, No 1. – С. 7–15; doi: 10.21122/2220-9506-2016-7-1-7-15.
(check this in PDF content)
2: Hadjadjy, A., Contact potential measurements with a local Kelvin probe. / A. Hadjadjy [et al.] // Philosophical magazine B. – 2001. – Vol. 11, no. 11. – Р. 1257– 1266; doi: 10.1080/13642810208223162.
(check this in PDF content)
3: Luo, G.-N. Influence of space charge on the performance of the Kelvin probe / G.-N. Luo [et al.] // Review of scientific instruments. – 2001. – Vol. 72, no. 5. – Р. 2350– 2357; doi: 10.1063/1.1367363.
(check this in PDF content)
4: Subrahmanyam, A. The Kelvin Probe for Surface Engineering: Fundamentals and Design / A. Subrahmanyam, S. Kumar. – USA : CRC Press, 2010. – 200 p.
(check this in PDF content)
5: Zharin, A.L. Contact Potential Difference Techniques As Probing Tools in Tribology and Surface Mapping / A.L. Zharin // Scanning Probe Microscopy in Nanoscience and Nanotechnology. – Heidelberg : SpringerVerlag, 2010. – P. 687–720.
(check this in PDF content)
6: Makino, T. Contact Potential Difference Measurement of Adhesion Process during Micro / Meso-scale Injection Upsetting / T. Makino [et al.] // Procedia Engineering. – 2014. – Vol. 81. – P. 444–449; doi: 10.1016/j.proeng.2014.10.020.
(check this in PDF content)
7: Kondo, A. Kelvin probe imaging of photo-injected electrons in metal oxide nanosheets from metal sulfide quantum dots under remote photochromic coloration / A. Kondo [et al.] // Nanoscale. – 2015. – no. 7. – Р. 12510– 12515.
(check this in PDF content)
8: Peterson, I. R. Kelvin probe liquid-surface potential sensor. / I. R. Peterson // Review of Scintific Instruments. – 1999. – Vol. 70, no. 7. – P. 3418–3424; doi: 10.1063/1.1149929.
(check this in PDF content)
9: Mazhar, M.E. Kelvin probe as an effective tool to develop sensitive p-type CuO gas sensors / M.E. Mazhar [et al.] / Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical. – 2016. – Vol. 222. – P. 1257–1263; doi: 10.1016/j.snb.2015.05.050.
(check this in PDF content)
10: Жарин, А.Л. Метод контактной разности потенциалов и его применение в трибологии / А.Л. Жарин. – Минск : Бестпринт, 1996. – 235 с.
(check this in PDF content)
11: Wicinski, M. Lateral resolution in scanning Kelvin probe microscopy / M. Wicinski, W. Burgstaller, A.W. Hassel // Corrosion Science. – 2016. – Vol. 104. – P. 1–8; doi: 10.1016/j.corsci.2015.09.008.
(check this in PDF content)
12: Rossi, F. Contact potential measurement: Spacing-dependence errors / F. Rossi // Review of Scintific Instruments. – 1992. – Vol. 63; doi :10.1063/1.1143230.
(check this in PDF content)
13: McMurray, H.N. Probe diameter and probespecimen distance dependence in the lateral resolution of a scanning Kelvin probe / H.N. McMurray, G. Williams // Journal of Applied Physics. – 2002. – Vol. 91, no. 3. – P. 1673–1679; doi :10.1063/1.1430546.
(check this in PDF content)
14: Klein, U. Contact potential differences measurement: Short history and experimental setup for classroom demonstration / U. Klein, W. Vollmann, A. Paulo // IEEE Transactions on Education. – 2003. – Vol. 3, no. 46. – P. 338–344.
(check this in PDF content)
15: Frankel, G. Potential control under thin aqueous layers using a Kelvin probe / G.S. Frankel [et al.] // Corrosion Science. – 2007. – Vol. 49. – P. 2021–2036; doi:10.1016/j.corsci.2006.10.017.
(check this in PDF content)